| 
Barbara Stauffacher Solomon,
supergraphics for Sea Ranch, 1966.
|
| 
Steff Geissbuhler, Geigy
brochure cover, 1965.
|
| 
Willi Kunz, page from '12
T y p o graphical Interpretations', 1975.
|
| 
Michael Vanderbyl, California
Public Radio poster, 1979.
|
|
During
the 1940s, only a moderate number of American magazines were designed
well. These included Fortune, a business magazine whose
art directors included Will Burtin and Leo Lionni; Vogue,
where Alexander Liberman replaced Dr. Agha as art director in
1943; and Harper's Bazaar, where Alexey Brodovitch continued
as art director until his retirement in 1958. One of Dr. Agha's
assistants at Vogue during the 1930s, Cipe Pineles, made
a major contribution to editorial design during the 1940s and
1950s, first as art director at Glamour, then at Seventeen,
Charm, and Mademoiselle. Pineles often commissioned
illustrations from fine artists, resulting in editorial pages
that broke with conventional imagery. Her publication designs
were characterized by a lyrical appreciation of color, pattern,
and form. Pineles became the first woman admitted to membership
in the New York Art Director's Club, breaking the bastion of the
male-dominated professional design societies.
In the late 1960s, broad factors at work in America ended the
era of large pages, huge photographs, and design as a significant
component of content. A two-decade period of ever-growing affluence
was yielding to inflation and economic problems. Television eroded
the magazine' advertising revenue and supplanted their traditional
role of providing popular fiction entertainment. At the same time,
public concerns about the Vietnam War, environmental problems,
the rights of minorities and women, and a host of other issues
produced a need for different magazines. The public demanded a
higher information content, and skyrocketing postal rates, paper
shortages, and escalating paper and printing costs shrank the
large-format periodicals.
Soothsayers predicted the death of the magazine as a communications
form during the 1960s; however, a smaller-format breed of new
periodicals emerged and thrived by addressing the interests of
specialized audiences. Advertisers who wished to reach these audiences
bought advertising space. The new editorial climate, with more
emphasis on content, longer text, and less opportunity for lavish
visual treatment, necessitated a new approach to editorial design.
Layout became more controlled, and the use of a consistent typographic
format and grid--undoubtedly under the influence of the International
Typographic Style--became the norm.
A playful direction in the 1950s and 1960s among New York graphic
designers involved figurative typography. This took many forms--letterforms
became objects; objects became letterforms. Another approach to
figurative typography used the visual properties of the words
themselves, or their organization in the space, to express an
idea. Typography was sometimes scratched, torn, bent, or vibrated
to express a concept or introduce the unexpected to the printed
page.
Moreover, a new advertising developed during this time. Although
the new advertising continued the essential orientation toward
persuasive selling techniques and subjective emotional appeals,
its methods were more honest, literate, and tasteful; advertising
talked intelligently to consumers.
The New York School was born from an excitement about European
modernism and fueled by economic and technological expansion;
it became a dominant force in graphic design from the 1940s until
the 1970s. Many of its practitioners, young revolutionaries who
altered the course of American visual communications in the 1940s
and 1950s, continued to design in the 1990s, as their design practices
reach the half-century mark.
|
| 
Rosmarie Tissi, direct-mail
folder for Anton Schöb printers, 1981.
|
| 
Wolfgang Weingart, exhibition
poster, 1982.
|
| 
Kenneth Hiebert, exhibition
and symposium poster, 1979.
|
| 
Michael Vanderbyl, cover
for an HBF business furniture catalogue, 1985.
|
|